lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Do I still need to display a warning message? It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. I checked and they don't work. The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. and leave it up to the user. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Customizing installed software before installing LM. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. to your account, Hi ! Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. @steve6375 It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? all give ERROR on my PC Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? @steve6375 then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. they reviewed all the source code). I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. DiskGenius Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. However the solution is not perfect enough. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Exactly. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" Not exactly. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). Already have an account? I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Any suggestions, bugs? I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. privacy statement. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. When the user select option 1. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Do I need a custom shim protocol? Any ideas? Do I still need to display a warning message? So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . ", same error during creating windows 7 No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). 6. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. , Laptop based platform: @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . I don't know why. I think it's OK. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. You are receiving this because you commented. size: 589 (617756672 byte) Just some of my thoughts: It says that no bootfile found for uefi. da1: quirks=0x2. Hiren's BootCD I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. Sign in You signed in with another tab or window. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. Option 2: bypass secure boot . ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. Sign in There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. A lot of work to do. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Keep reading to find out how to do this. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Of course , Added. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. There are many kinds of WinPE. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. VMware or VirtualBox) It only causes problems. What matters is what users perceive and expect. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? GRUB mode fixed it! I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. and leave it up to the user. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. All the .efi files may not be booted. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. The virtual machine cannot boot. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. You can repair the drive or replace it. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. slax 15.0 boots MediCAT Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. Tested on 1.0.77. Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. Yes. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. @pbatard, have you tested it? I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file I have this same problem. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. @blackcrack Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Does shim still needed in this case? So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy.